Amul, Amul
i Photo: Open Food Facts contributors · CC BY-SA
Chocolate candies · United States

Amul

by Amul
United StatesIndia
NUTRI-SCOREABCDENOVA4
545 kcalper 100 g · 27% of the reference intake
45.5 gof sugars per 100 g
Barcode (EAN-13)8901262070430
GS1 prefix890 · GS1 India
Additives2: E322, E322i
AllergensMilk, SoybeansMay contain: Gluten
8901262070430

Prefix 890 was issued by GS1 India. It tells you where the code was registered, not where the product was made.

Nutrition

Per 100 g, with the % Daily Value (2,000-calorie diet)
Nutrient100 gDaily Value
Calories545 kcal27%
Total fat31.8 g41%
Saturated fat20.9 g105%
Total carbohydrate54.5 g20%
Total sugars45.5 g—
Protein9.1 g18%
Sodium0.09 g4%

Open Food Facts, ODbL, record updated October 18, 2026 · Daily Values: 21 CFR 101.9 (FDA).

Ingredients

As printed on the pack; allergens in bold

sugar, cocoa butter, partially skimmed milk powder, cocoa powder, emulsifiers (soya lecithin, polyglycerol esters of interesterified ricinoleic acid), artificial vanilla , cocoa flavors added, allergen information: contains milk , soyabean, made in a facility that processes tree-nuts , wheat tted imp, ,

  • E322LecithinsAntioxidant · Emulsifier
  • E322iLecithinAntioxidant · Emulsifier

Source: Open Food Facts, ODbL · additive names and functions: Open Food Facts taxonomy.

In its category

Position among 5,465 “chocolate candies” products sold in the United States
Sugars45.5 g · median 48.0 g
Saturated fat20.9 g · median 17.9 g
Salt0.23 g · median 0.19 g

43% of products in the category contain less sugar than this one. The thin line marks the category median.

See all products in “Chocolate candies” →

Shelfpedia calculation from Open Food Facts (ODbL) and USDA FoodData Central (CC0) records in the same category sold in the United States, values per 100 g.

Countries of sale

Sold under this barcode in 2 countries
IndiaUnited States

Source: Open Food Facts, countries of sale reported by contributors.

Sources

Every block on this page cites its source

Spotted an error? It is fixed at the source, on Open Food Facts, and shows up here at the next update.