Rote Bete-Meerrettich, Food for Future
i Photo: Open Food Facts contributors · CC BY-SA
Spreads · United States

Rote Bete-Meerrettich

by Food for Future
United States
NUTRI-SCOREABDECNOVA3
301 kcalper 100 g · 15% of the reference intake
5.5 gof sugars per 100 g
Barcode (EAN-8)23250161
GS1 prefix232
AdditivesNone found in the ingredients
AllergensNot given in the source
LabelsVegetarian, Organic, EU Organic

Nutrition

Per 100 g, with the % Daily Value (2,000-calorie diet)
Nutrient100 gDaily Value
Calories301 kcal15%
Total fat27.0 g35%
Saturated fat2.8 g14%
Total carbohydrate9.2 g3%
Total sugars5.5 g—
Dietary fiber2.0 g7%
Protein4.3 g9%
Sodium0.48 g21%

Open Food Facts, ODbL, record updated June 19, 2026 · Daily Values: 21 CFR 101.9 (FDA).

Ingredients

As printed on the pack; allergens in bold

Rote Bete* 34%, Sonnenblumenöl*, Wasser, Sonnenblumenkerne*, Meerrettichzubereitung* 8,8% (Meerrettich* 78%** Branntweinessig*, Wasser, Meersalz), Rote-Bete-Saftkonzentrat* 3%, Zitronensaftkonzentrat*, Apfelsaftkonzentrat*, Meersalz, Maisstärke, Branntweinessig* ** aus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft *entspricht einem Anteil von 6,9% im Endprodukt.

The ingredient list is only available in German in the source; we show it as it is, without translation.

Source: Open Food Facts, ODbL · additive names and functions: Open Food Facts taxonomy.

In its category

Position among 33 “spreads” products sold in the United States
Sugars5.5 g · median 4.8 g
Saturated fat2.8 g · median 10.0 g
Salt1.2 g · median 1.4 g

56% of products in the category contain less sugar than this one. The thin line marks the category median.

See all products in “Spreads” →

Shelfpedia calculation from Open Food Facts (ODbL) and USDA FoodData Central (CC0) records in the same category sold in the United States, values per 100 g.

Countries of sale

Sold under this barcode in the United States
United States

Source: Open Food Facts, countries of sale reported by contributors.

Sources

Every block on this page cites its source

Spotted an error? It is fixed at the source, on Open Food Facts, and shows up here at the next update.