Smash, OLW
i Photo: Open Food Facts contributors · CC BY-SA
Chocolate candies · United Kingdom

Smash

by OLW · 100 g
United KingdomSweden
NUTRI-SCOREABCDENOVA4
541 kcalper 100 g · 27% of the reference intake
38.0 gof sugars per 100 g
Barcode (EAN-13)7310520006851
GS1 prefix731 · GS1 Sweden
Additives2: E500, E500ii
AllergensMilk, SoybeansMay contain: Nuts
LabelsSustainable farming, No palm oil, Rainforest Alliance
7310520006851

Prefix 731 was issued by GS1 Sweden. It tells you where the code was registered, not where the product was made.

Nutrition

Per 100 g, with the share of an adult’s reference intake (8,400 kJ / 2,000 kcal)
Nutrient100 gReference intake
Energy541 kcal27%
Fat33.0 g47%
of which saturates16.0 g80%
Carbohydrate53.0 g20%
of which sugars38.0 g42%
Fibre0.30 g—
Protein8.1 g16%
Salt0.22 g4%

Open Food Facts, ODbL, record updated 27 March 2026 · Reference intakes: Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex XIII.

Ingredients

As printed on the pack; allergens in bold

sugar, milk powder , cornmeal, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, sunflower oil, shea oil, tapioca starch, coconut oil, emulsifier ( soy lecithin ), baking soda (sodium bicarbonate), salt, aroma,

  • E500Sodium carbonatesStabiliser · Thickener
  • E500iiSodium hydrogen carbonateStabiliser · Thickener

Source: Open Food Facts, ODbL · additive names and functions: Open Food Facts taxonomy.

In its category

Position among 105 “chocolate candies” products sold in the United Kingdom
Sugars38.0 g · median 53.0 g
Saturates16.0 g · median 14.9 g
Salt0.22 g · median 0.25 g

18% of products in the category contain less sugar than this one. The thin line marks the category median.

See all products in “Chocolate candies” →

Shelfpedia calculation from Open Food Facts (ODbL), products in the same category sold in the United Kingdom, values per 100 g.

Countries of sale

Sold under this barcode in 2 countries
SwedenUnited Kingdom

Source: Open Food Facts, countries of sale reported by contributors.

Sources

Every block on this page cites its source

Spotted an error? It is fixed at the source, on Open Food Facts, and shows up here at the next update.