Manner - Chocolate Cream Filled Wafers, 2.5oz (72g), Manner
i Photo: Open Food Facts contributors · CC BY-SA
Wafers · India

Manner - Chocolate Cream Filled Wafers, 2.5oz (72g)

by Manner · 2
India
NUTRI-SCOREABCDE
500 kcalper 100 g · 25% of the reference intake
30.0 gof sugars per 100 g
Barcode (EAN-13)0073935942400
GS1 prefix007 · GS1 US
AdditivesNone found in the ingredients
AllergensNot given in the source
0073935942400

Prefix 007 was issued by GS1 US. It tells you where the code was registered, not where the product was made.

Nutrition

Per 100 g, with the share of an adult’s reference intake (8,400 kJ / 2,000 kcal)
Nutrient100 gReference intake
Energy500 kcal25%
Fat26.7 g38%
of which saturates23.3 g117%
Carbohydrate63.3 g24%
of which sugars30.0 g33%
Fibre3.3 g—
Protein3.3 g7%
Salt0.08 g1%

Open Food Facts, ODbL, record updated 19 October 2026 · Reference intakes: Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex XIII.

Ingredients

As printed on the pack; allergens in bold

Test

Source: Open Food Facts, ODbL · additive names and functions: Open Food Facts taxonomy.

In its category

Position among 29 “wafers” products sold in India
Sugars30.0 g · median 34.0 g
Saturates23.3 g · median 15.4 g
Salt0.08 g · median 0.38 g

39% of products in the category contain less sugar than this one. The thin line marks the category median.

See all products in “Wafers” →

Shelfpedia calculation from Open Food Facts (ODbL), products in the same category sold in India, values per 100 g.

Climate impact

2.21kg CO₂e per kg

Reference value for the category “Wafers”: 2.21 kg CO₂e per kg of product.

Calculated by ADEME for the average product consumed in France, from field to plate. It describes the category, not this exact product.

Source: Agribalyse 3.1 (ADEME), Licence Ouverte, update of 30 June 2026 · category match: Open Food Facts taxonomy.

Countries of sale

Sold under this barcode in India
India

Source: Open Food Facts, countries of sale reported by contributors.

Sources

Every block on this page cites its source

Spotted an error? It is fixed at the source, on Open Food Facts, and shows up here at the next update.